One or two readers might be interested in my position on the current matter in Washington.
Here is the relevant part of a single page letter I hand-delivered to the office of my Congressperson on September 2, 2019:
“IMPEACHMENT: (SUPPORT) I strongly believe that the House of Representatives needs to deal aggressively with the impeachment… issue. It is an extraordinarily difficult political situation, I know. On the other hand, it is probably the most important single issue that this country has ever had to confront concerning the rule of law. What makes this even more difficult is that the radical right has become expert in the business of assessing guilt by accusation: to be accused is to be guilty, it seems. Our legal system, while more cumbersome (things like rules of evidence, etc.) can be unwieldy, but it sure beats dictatorship. I subscribe to the philosophy that the Force of Law is far better than the authoritarian preferred Law of Force [see POSTNOTE].
I strongly supported Robert Muellers approach to the complexities of the issues, and Speaker Pelosi’s approach as well. The Mueller Report lays out the evidence, which I think has to be pursued, regardless of the risks.”
(At the time I wrote the letter, I had no idea about the much more recent Ukraine issue.)
In 1998, I expressed concern in impeachment of another president. I sent a copy of this letter to this list in a prior post, sharing my feelings about Bill Clinton in 1998: Clinton Impeachment001. (I was and remain a strong supporter of Bill Clinton, as I was and am a strong supporter of Hillary Clinton.)
The U.S. does not have clean hands in the matter of interfering in the politics of other nations. There have been endless examples, here’s an informal and short list: Iran, Haiti, Middle East, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Philippines, Central America…. Some of these I have closer interest and a bit more knowledge. Here’s something I wrote about Haiti back in 2006, for instance. Of course, it is customary to blame the President – if of the other party – but it is never that simple. President Theodore Roosevelt (Republican) is revered as a Progressive (national parks and the like), was also an expansionist. President are often shaped by events over which they have little control or sometimes even pre-knowledge – they take someone’s advice. On the other hand, we, the people, have the ultimate responsibility. Ours is, after all, a democracy….
But, in the current American situation, as a noted Presidential historian stated on live TV this morning, #45 makes his predecessor Presidents “look like Boy Scouts”.
Anyone who knows me well, knows that I’m (depending on one’s word of choice) a “globalist”, an “internationalist”, a supporter of the United Nations…and a “patriot” who loves my country, and deeply respects the rights of the citizens of other countries as well.
In this country, at this moment in time, I feel the obvious intention of the current Republican regime is to make people like myself permanently irrelevant in public policy. We are not the enemy. In fact, without us, this democracy is in peril.
Yesterday we met with our friend who is now 93, and today flies to her native Germany. She grew up in Hitler’s Germany, and wrote a very well-read book about her experience from 1926-47. Her trip to Germany is occasioned by the translation of her book into her native German, and its introduction comes next week at the famed Frankfurt Book Fair. A week from now she’ll speak to book sellers and film makers who might have a special interest in her book.
I asked our friend how she would deal with questions about U.S. politics (she’s lived in Minnesota since 1947). She’s certainly been thinking about it. Her opinion is her own to be shared in some way by herself next week. The one fact she mentioned is that 1936 was probably the single good year for Germans in the time of her years in Nazi Germany.
My only advice to everyone: pay very close attention. Our country is at stake….
POSTNOTE: I think I first saw the use of the words “Force of Law, or Law of Force” in a poster made by my friend, Dr. Joe Schwartzberg in 2008. Here is that photo, one of 30 in his series.
Joe Schwartzberg died a year ago, but his work continues. Here is his website.
The “Force of Law” vs “Law of Force” is, in a way, presuming a world that works rationally, presumption of shared power. What happens when one side intentionally works to pass laws which disempower the other “side”, and in addition, attempts to control the composition of courts which interpret those laws? Over the arc of history, there have been many schemes to empower one side, and disempower the other. In the longer term, they never prevail, regardless of the weapon. Still, lessons seem never to be learned.
One of the organizations in which I am most active is Citizens for Global Solutions (CGS) (formerly called World Federalists), whose members advocate for a community of nations which are subject to rules and merit respect. There are about 193 of these nations, ranging from the very tiny to the immense. The United States has always been the big dog in the arena, by virtue of being on the winning side in WWII, and having economic dominance (we have about one-fourth of the global wealth with less than 5% of the population).
On October 23, I will have all of Joe’s posters on display at an important gathering at the James J. Hill House in St. Paul. Consider attending. Here are the details: Flier Oct 23rd event JJ Hill House-v4. This is a reservation required event.
COMMENTS (more at the end)
Pre-note: I post all comments, without editing, not violating requested privacy. Occasionally someone will ask that their name not be used. In most cases, I only use first names, or the first letter of a name, or rarely “anonymous”. Every comment is monitored by myself. I don’t mind differences of opinion.
Yesterday (Sep 30) one of the first comments came as one of those lovely “forwards” that cast aspersions on Muslims in the Twin Cities – the topic was a YouTube video that implied that the Mall of America was overrun by violent Somali Muslims, and went on from there. I’m not sure why the sender – who I know well – even sent it on, though there were a series of question marks preceding it (???????????) It even had a video for proof. The sender of the forward lives hundreds of miles from the Mall; I live 15 miles or so from the Mall, and on rare occasions go there (I’m no shopper.)
The smear of Muslims was, of course, false in its implications. There had been a violent incident at the Mall, and the perpetrator was apparently Muslim, so that part was most likely true. On the other hand, Mall of America remains immensely popular. Its website (as of yesterday) claims 40,000,000 visitors a year; I once heard that every day it has over 100,000 people on premises, making it one of Minnesota’s largest cities. It is very rarely in the news, and on those rare occasions the problems are dealt with. There is no oppressive presence of police, though it doubtless has security befitting the large number of visitors every day, most of whom are not regulars, people like myself. But in the world of truly fake news, bits and pieces of propaganda whir around on this and many other topics. So, on we go.
I won’t give the video additional publicity by passing it on. The person who passed it on, passed it on without additional comment (unless the ?????? was a comment). Doubtless, it can be found on the internet. But it doesn’t represent any semblance of the truth. I solicit more comments.
from Brian: Dick, thanks for sharing. In my youth I had to deal with the perfidious lying mass killer LBJ. Trump’s not nearly as [b]ad, trust me.
from Dick, to Brian: “Good to hear from you. I really do want to hear more specifics about your two sentences.” When Brian gives specifics, I’ll post along with a specific response. I specifically referenced today’s Just Above Sunset. I also recommend the City Pages article mentioned in my response to David, below. I gave Brian my personal experience during the LBJ times, as follows:
I do have some history…. I could go on at greater length.
Brian in response, Oct 1: Now my response to you,Dick. So…okay. First of all, thank for the update on Peg [mutual friend]…she’s such a great people photographer. And also wow! You do have a history with Vietnam and LBJ, too!
from Joyce: “This is excellent”.Answers to Impeachment Objections from The Weekly Sift
from Judy: As usual, Dick, your insights, and comments lift up truth and justice. Thank you for taking the time to address such urgent issue. Impeachment, a necessity!!!
from R or M (both have same e-address, conveyed as received): DICK—HOW IN THE HELL CAN YOU BE A HILLARY FAN???????AND A DEMOCRATE IN THIS DAY AND AGE???????? NANCY P. ???JOE BIDON????AND IF YOU CAN NOT SEE ALL THAT TRUMP HAS DONE IN HIS SHORT TIME —-YOU HAVE TO BE??????? HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO CLEAN THE SWAMP —NANCY AND ALL
THOSE [???????] I HOPE THEY KEEP RUNNING AT THE MOUTH—–TRUNP WELL WIN IN A LAND SLID——I CAN NOT BELIEVE YOU ARE FOR –EMPEACHMENT———JOE AND HIS SON HAVE RIPPED OFF BILLIONS —-I COULD GO ON —BUT HEAR IS WHAT YOU DEMOCRATS NEED TO REMEMBER [ IF WE EVERFORGET THAT WE ARE ONE NATION UNDER GOD —THEN WE WILL BE A NATION GONE UNDER–RONALD REAGAN—–]DO NOT SEND ME ANYMORE OF YOUR SHIT —-GOD AHILLARY LOVER —-I CAN NOT BELIEVE YOU???????????
from Dick: It’s more or less a free country, yet.
from Carol, Oct 1: It never ceases to amaze me how many of those hate-filled anti-Democrat/anti-Hillary/anti-Obama, etc. ranters can’t spell their way out of a paper bag – including the names of past (or future) presidents.
A suggestion: If you want to be taken seriously, ditch the caps key and all the !!!!!!!!!!!!! and learn some spelling.
from a true believer in belief: I believe that the accusations against Trump are the very things that the Democrats have done or are doing. It’s been confirmed by the UK leader that Hillary rigged the 2016 election & /or solicited support from them and the Russians. I am against Impeachment of Trump; Obama Brennan, & Hillary committed serious impeachable offenses and they were given a pass. Darleen
from Dick in response: Per your request, your name is deleted. I am puzzled by the “hate” narrative. You and I, to my knowledge or recollection, have never visited in person, by letter or other means. The only way you know me these days is by these occasional writings. My blog account says that I have done 1,484 posts at this address in the last ten years. Every one of them is archived here. Never has “hate” been attached to me or to my posts by anyone. Never. I have been extraordinarily measured. But, to each his (or her) own opinion. I’m a perennial optimist. We are going to get through this.
from David, Oct 1 (David originally responded below): It’s a bit frightening to think that people such as R or M actually exist. Their post is so over the top that I suspect that it’s someone trolling you. Not that that makes me feel much better. People (mostly) on the right, seem so secure in their hatred towards–and fear of–the other side that one can envision them actually taking up arms. I guess it’s already happening here and there—Charlottesville, the mosque bombing here in the land of Minnesota Nice, the synagogue shooting, etc.
You and I are of the age where we can remember the violent protests and police reaction of the sixties. The Weather Underground, Sarah Jane Olson, Black Panthers, and their ilk, all believed that their side had cornered the market on the truth that they were justified in using violence towards those who disagreed with them. True believers are frightening.
You’re right, we do need to stay optimistic. The country got through the sixties, Nixon, McCarthyism, anarchists, J. Edgar Hoover, and worse. Then there was the little matter of the Civil War.
I’m sure that no matter what turns up in the impeachment process, folks like R or M will stick with their orange-haired savior. The best thing that could come out of impeachment would be that it fires up the Democratic base to actually get out and vote and will persuade those who took a flyer on Trump last time to vote Democratic or not vote at all. A thorough trouncing of Trump and the Republicans in 2020 could be the reset that the country needs and even shock the Republicans into redefining themselves into something other than the party of Trump and all of the ugliness that he stands for.